California Alliance to Stop the Spray


Main Menu

Home

About Us

Mission Statement

Campaign Platform

San Francisco Chapter

Action Teams

Info Links

Search

Contact Us



For updated
information and
related events on this issue, visit
LBAMspray.com
and the other
websites listed on
our Links page!!



Watch LBAM
Movie Trailer
:

 


CASS Press Release
May 5, 2008


(Download pdf file)


California Alliance To Stop the Spray (CASS)


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Monday, May 5, 2008

Press contact:
Foster Gamble
(831) 464-1777
Foster@CASSonline.org



Spraying Toxic to Local Economies

Tourism and real estate would be major victims of aerial spraying in nine Northern California counties for the Light Brown Apple Moth (LBAM), losing from $200 million to $2 billion, far larger than the US Department of agricultureís projected crop losses for all California growers.

And thatís just the tip of the iceberg. In addition to all figures in the report, a ripple effect reduces tax income and sales for businesses patronized by workers in all these areas for up to 10 years. All figures are based on a 1 percent to 10 percent drop in revenues. These calculations are just part of a report released today by the California Alliance to Stop the Spray (CASS) on economic costs and human rights violations by the LBAM project. Foster Gamble, a business executive, led the team that produced the report. Above all, we are concerned about peopleís health, but we are also concerned about how the aerial spraying will impact peopleís financial well being, Gamble said. If tourism drops off just 1 percent, there would be a loss of $198 million a year. Already, there is chat on a premier travel site recommending avoiding these areas if the spray resumes.

In real estate, property values could plummet further in an already weakened market, as fewer people would want to move to neighborhoods being continually sprayed with pesticides. If property values dropped just 1 percent, Gamble said, property owners would lose a staggering $25.7 billion in equity. Already, the Marin Association of Realtors has changed disclosure forms because some attorneys believe disclosure is wise to ward off potential lawsuits. Part of this wording is: Buyer is advised to consult with environmental health specialists and physicians for further information regarding pesticide spraying. The CASS Economic Impacts and Solutions report projects a spray-related loss to real estate agents Commissions of $17.8 million.

Gamble and his team warn that organic farmers are also going be hit hard if this program continues. Shoppers want to know if the produce has been sprayed, not if the USDA says it still qualifies as organic, says Gamble. Our report projects that organic farms could lose between $2.8 and $28.8 million annually in Santa Cruz County and Monterey County alone. Thatís just 1 to 10 percent, a conservative estimates compared with the spinach E coli contamination in 2006, which dropped local farmers revenues by 28 percent.

To date, the LBAM has caused no crop damage in California. That lack of crop damage was part of the basis for a Santa Cruz County Superior Court judge halting the spraying until the state could complete an Environmental Impact Report (EIR).

Along with economic analysis and related topics, the CASS report finds faults with the agricultural agencies figures. The stateís estimates of damage, the report explains, are based on outdated calculations related to Australian losses before they got rid of old fashioned pesticides that killed LBAM predators. The stateís calculations also include costs of research and chemical treatments as if they were damage to crops. The report also proposes 21 solutions to the aerial spraying problem. All, according to Gamble, are costeffective and environmentally sustainable. The report also calls for community economic impacts to be included in the EIR health assessments.

 

 



Calendar
of Events


Press
Releases
& Reports


Spray
Dates &
Zones

 

 

 

© 2008 California Alliance to Stop the Spray - All Rights Reserved.